Is India for all or for only few people in India? Does the rule of the land apply to all the people in India or some rules are for some people and other rules are for other people?
Some in Congress today posed one direct question. Incidentally the TDP leaders too posed the same question.
Are the rules in India different for Rahul Gandhi and YS Jagan Mohan Reddy?
Since the past few years, the 'anti-socials' like Bal Thachrey and his nephew Raj Thachrey have been leading a campaign and claimed that the North Indians are looting the people of Maharashtra. They have carried out various attacks on the Hindi, Gujarati etc speaking people in Maharashtra and also claimed that Mumbai belongs to only the Marathis.
In the midst of this controversy, they asked Rahul Gandhi to not to enter Mumbai since it belongs to only the Marathi people. But few months back, Rahul Gandhi defied their threat and toured the Mumbai region.
Similarly the TRS leaders, KCR and his nephew Harish Rao has been claiming that the Telangana region and also Hyderabad belongs to only the Telangana people and asked the people of Andhra and Rayalaseema to get out of the region and came up with a slogan "Andhrawala Bhaago, Telanganawala Jaago".
But YS Jagan Mohan Reddy was asked by Sonia Gandhi to not to enter the Telangana region!! When it encouraged Rahul Gandhi to enter Mumbai, why should it stop YS Jagan from entering the Telangana region? And Rosaiah made sure that the TRS activists oppose his entry at any cost.
So one rule for his highness Rahul Gandhi and another rule for people like YS Jagan?
Login to add comments on this post.